Main Article Content
Objective: Postoperative intraabdominal adhesions still cause significant morbidity in surgical patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of an immunosuppressor known as Sirolimus and an antiadhesive membrane which is formed with sodium hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm™) to the intraabdominal adhesion formation in a rat model.
Materials and Methods: This experimental study was performed at an experimental research center, Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul. Spraque-Dawley Rats, at a weight of about 250±20 gr, were used. Group 1 (n=8): Abdomen was closed after applying cecal abrasion (control group), group 2 (n=8): 10 x 30 mm Seprafilm™ was applied under the abdominal wall after cecal abrasion ( Seprafilm™ group ). Group 3 (n =8): Sirolimus (0,5 mg/kg) was applied (Sirolimus group). Adhesions quantitatively evaluated by a blinded assessor according to the classification of Nair and his colleagues.
Results: Statistically significant difference in terms of adhesion severity scores according to the Nair classification was found between the Sirolimus and the control group (p=0,03). Whereas, no statistically significant difference was found between the Seprafilm™ and the control group (p=0,17). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found between Seprafilm™ and sirolimus group (p=0,64).
Conclusion: Although there was no statistically significant difference between intraperitoneal application of Sirolimus and Seprafilm™ group (p = 0.57), a statistically significant difference was found when each group compared with the control group (p=0,03). Combined anti-adhesive effect of Sirolimus and Seprafilm™ can be evaluated in future studies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
2. Herrick SE, Mutsaers SE, Ozua P, Sulaiman H, Omer A, Boulos P, et al. Human peritoneal adhesions are highly cellular, innervated, and vascularized. The Journal of pathology. 2000;192(1):67–72.
3. Müller SA, Treutner KH, Tietze L, Anurov M, Titkova S, Polivoda M, et al. Efficacy of adhesion prevention and impact on wound healing of intraperitoneal phospholipids. Journal of Surgical Research. 2001;96(1):68–74.
4. Erkol H, Perek S, Tunalı H, Sanal İ. Ratlarda karın içi yapışıkların önlenmesinde intraperitoneal heparin ve sodyum karboksimetilsellülozun etkileri. Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi. 1993;7:47–51.
5. DeCherney AH. Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general urgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers. Surgical Clinics of North America. 1997;77(3):671–88.
6. Guvenal T, Cetin A, Ozdemir H, Yanar O, Kaya T. Prevention of postoperative adhesion formation in rat uterine horn model by nimesulide: a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Human Reproduction. 2001;16(8):1732–5.
7. Nair SK, Bhat IK, Aurora AL. Role of proteolytic enzyme in the prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Archives of surgery. 1974;108(6):849–53.
8. Conze J, Junge K, Klinge U, Weiss C, Polivoda M, Oettinger AP, et al. Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh Influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques. 2005;19(6):798–803.
9. Ellis H, Harrison W, Hugh TB. The healing of peritoneum under normal and pathological conditions. British journal of Surgery. 1965;52(6):471–6.
10. Tanphiphat C, Chittmlttrapap S, Prasopsunti K. Adhesive small bowel obstruction: a review of 321 cases in a Thai hospital. The American journal of surgery. 1987;154(3):283–7.
11. Perry Jr JF, Smith GA, Yonehiro EG. Intestinal obstruction caused by adhesions: a review of 388 cases. Annals of surgery. 1955;142(5):810.
12. Luijendijk RW, de Lange DC, Wauters CC, Hop WC, Duron JJ, Pailler JL, et al. Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Annals of surgery. 1996;223(3):242.
13. Boys F. The prophylaxis of peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature. Surgery. 1942;11(1):118–68.
14. Saba AA, Kaidi AA, Godziachvili V, Dombi GW, Dawe EJ, Libcke JH, et al. Effects of interleukin-6 and its neutralizing antibodies on peritoneal adhesion formation and wound healing. The American Surgeon. 1996;62(7):569–72.
15. Hershlag A, Otterness IG, Bliven ML, Diamond MP, Polan ML. The effect of interleukin-1 on adhesion formation. in the rat. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1991;165(3):771–4.
16. Holschneider CH, Cristoforoni PM, Ghosh K, Punyasavatsut M, Abed E, Montz FJ. Endogenous versus exogenous IL-10 in postoperative intraperitoneal adhesion formation in a murine model. Journal of Surgical Research. 1997;70(2):138–43.
17. Cheong YC, Shelton JB, Laird SM, Richmond M, Kudesia G, Li TC, et al. IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations in the peritoneal fluid of women with pelvic adhesions. Human Reproduction. 2002;17(1):69–75.
18. Golan A, Maymon R, Winograd I, Bukovsky I. Prevention of post-surgical adhesion formation using aspirin in a rodent model: a preliminary report. Human Reproduction. 1995;10(7):1797–800.
19. Rodgers KE, Johns DB, Girgis W, Campeau J. Reduction of adhesion formation with hyaluronic acid after peritoneal surgery in rabbits. Fertility and sterility. 1997;67(3):553–8.
20. Wiseman DM, Gottlick-Iarkowski L, Kamp L. Effect of different barriers of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) on cecal and sidewall adhesions in the presence and absence of bleeding. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 1999;12(3):141–6.
21. Oncel M, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, Connor JT, Fazio VW. Comparison of a novel liquid (Adcon-P®) and a sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose membrane (SeprafilmTM) in postsurgical adhesion formation in a murine model. Diseases of the colon & rectum. 2003;46(2):187–91.
22. Zhou J, Elson C, Lee TD. Reduction in postoperative adhesion formation and re-formation after an abdominal operation with the use of N, O-carboxymethyl chitosan. Surgery. 2004;135(3):307–12.
23. Pozzetto U, Citterio F, Romagnoli J, Scatà MC, Nanni G. Effects of immunosuppressive regimens on plasma levels of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in renal transplant recipients. In: Transplantation proceedings. 2002. p. 1740–2.
24. Cao W, Mohacsi P, Shorthouse R, Pratt R, Morris RE. Effects of rapamycin on growth factor-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cell DNA synthesis inhibition of basic fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor action and antagonism of rapamycin by FK506. Transplantation. 1995;59(3):390–4.