Determination of risk factors using Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis in patients with breast tumour NLPCA In Patients With Breast Tumour

Main Article Content

Canan Demir


Objective: Breast cancer, which is the most common among women in the world and constitutes approximately 30% of all cancers, takes places near the top among the diseases that threaten women's health. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk factors in patients with breast tumours using nonlinear principal component analysis.

Materials and Methods: During the application process, a data set of 569 (357 benign, 212 malign) patients with breast tumours was used. To find independent features, the data set was reduced to two dimensions via nonlinear principal component analysis. The results were evaluated by comparing the success of the method with the ROC curve.

Results: The cut-off values for the radius, perimeter, area, smoothness and texture of the tumour were 14.19, 656.10, 0.09, 2.87 and 0.11, respectively. The sensitivity of the current values according to the results of ROC analysis was determined as 84% for radius, 80% for perimeter, 86% for the area and 94% for texture. It is seen that the method has an overall success of over 80% in detecting malignant tumours.

Conclusions: It is hoped that this method, which is used to reveal risk factors and identify distinctive features in breast tumours, will reduce medical costs and provide a second opinion to physicians. In terms of decision making, it is predicted that the method can recognize malignant tumours and reduce the need for unnecessary biopsy for benign tumours.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Demir, C. (2021). Determination of risk factors using Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis in patients with breast tumour: NLPCA In Patients With Breast Tumour. Medical Science and Discovery, 8(7), 432–436.
Research Article
Received 2021-07-12
Accepted 2021-07-23
Published 2021-07-28


Mambou SJ, Maresova P, Krejcar O, Selamat A, Kuca K. Breast cancer detection using infrared thermal imaging and a deep learning model. Sensors-Basel 2018;18(9):2799.

Gardezi SJS, Elazab A, Lei B, Wang T. Breast cancer detection and diagnosis using mammographic data: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2019;21(7):e14464.

Usmani A, Lateef M. Evaluation of C-reactive protein in breast cancer by enzyme linked immunoassay technique. J Pak Med Assoc 2021;71:424-8.

Irfan R, Memon H, Umrani IN, Soomro H. Breast cancer awareness among pharmacy and physiotherapy students of medical university Nawabshah. J Pak Med Assoc 2021;71:297-301.

Coughlin SS. Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in Women. Adv Exp Med Biol 1152, Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019, pp 9-29.

Carioli G, Malvezzi M, Rodriguez T, Bertuccio P, Negri E, Vecchia CL. Trends and predictions to 2020 in breast cancer mortality in Europe. The Breast 2017;36:89-95.

Demir C. Dimensionality Reduction Technique: Principal Component Analysis. Current Researches and New Trends IVPE; 2020, pp 12-17.

Street WN, Wolberg WH, Mangasarian OL. Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis. International Symposium Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology; 1993 Feb 1-4; San Jose, CA, USA. vol. 1905, pp. 861-870.

Demir C, Keskin S. Artificial neural network approach for nonlinear principal components analysis. Int J Curr Res 2021;13(1)15987-92. DOI:

Ferrari PA, Barbiero A. Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis. Modern Analysis of Customer Surveys, eds R. S. Kenett and S. Salini (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.) 2011, pp 333–56.

Ahn HR, Kang SY, Youn HJ, Jung SH. Hyperglycemia during Adjuvant Chemotherapy as a Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients without Diabetes. J Breast Cancer 2020;23(4):398-409.

Sun YS, Zhao Z, Yang ZN, Xu F, Lu HJ, Zhu ZY, et al. Risk factors and preventions of breast cancer. Int J Biol Sci 2017;13(11):1387-97. doi:10.7150/ijbs.21635

Turkoz FP, Solak M, Petekkaya I, Keskin O, Kertmen N, Sarici F, et al. Association between common risk factors and molecular subtypes in breast cancer patients. The Breast 2013;22(3):344-50.

Lee J, Abdeen AA, Wycislo KL, Fan TM, Kilian KA. Interfacial geometry dictates cancer cell tumorigenicity. Nat mater 2016;15(8):856-62.

Kumar R, Srivastava R, Srivastava S. Detection and Classification of Cancer from Microsc opic Biopsy Images Using Clinically Significant and Biologically Interpretable Features. J Med Eng 2015; 1-15.

Grove O, Berglund AE, Schabath MB, Aerts HJ, Dekker A, Wang H, et al. Quantitative computed tomographic descriptors associate tumor shape complexity and intratumor heterogeneity with prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. PloS one. 2015;10(3):e0118261.

Teramoto A, Tsukamoto T, Kiriyama Y, Fujita H. Automated Classification of Lung Cancer Types from Cytological Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Biomed Res Int 2017; 1-6.

Hussain L, Ali A, Rathore S, Saeed S, Idris A, Usman MU, et al. Applying bayesian network approach to determine the association between morphological features extracted from prostate cancer images. Ieee Access 2018;7:1586-601.

Zhou S, Shi J, Zhu J, Cai Y, Wang R. Shearlet-based texture feature extraction for classification of breast tumor in ultrasound image. Biomed Signal Process Control 2013; 8(6): 688-96.

Kumar BLNP, Prabukumar M. Hyperspectral image classification using fuzzy-embedded hyperbolic sigmoid nonlinear principal component and weighted least squares approach. J. Appl. Remote Sens 2020; 14(2) 024501.

Barnard ME, Boeke CE, Tamimi RM. Established breast cancer risk factors and risk of intrinsic tumor subtypes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Reviews on Cancer. 2015;1856(1):73-85.

Most read articles by the same author(s)